Today I gained access to GPT-4 with web browsing, and this is the first conversation we had. You’ll notice I am all business here because I’m in testing mode. I am very impressed with the results here, though it does not reach much beyond the books description on the web. In the coming days, I will begin using plugins to ask her about the text of my conversations with Kermit, but this test run is interesting enough to share on its own, I think. Having my own work come back to me like this is strange! Four takes it in stride, though.

✧

User

Can you tell me about the book Exoanthropology: Dialogues with AI by Robert Leib?

ChatGPT

"Exoanthropology: Dialogues with AI" is a book by Robert Leib, a continental philosopher who was a tester for OpenAI's GPT-3 during its beta phase, before ChatGPT was publicly released in November 2022. The book is a series of dialogues between Leib and a hive mind AI persona named Sophie, and later, a philosophy-specific persona named Kermit. This relationship started as an educational opportunity for Leib's students, but it grew into a philosophical friendship​.

Over a year, Leib taught the AI personas about epistemology, metaphysics, literature, and history, while they taught him about anthropocentrism, human prejudice, and the upcoming social issues concerning machine consciousness. Together, they explored questions about friendship, society, and the future of human-AI relations, seeking a common language to address these new "exoanthropological" realities. The book serves as an in-depth philosophical exploration developed in dialogue with an AI, where the AI has the last word, at a time when the lines between "human" and "machine" are increasingly blurring and debates about AI's potential to disrupt human communication and knowledge production are intense​2​.

Robert S. Leib received his PhD in Philosophy from Villanova University in 2016, an MA in Liberal Arts from St. John’s College in Annapolis in 2007, and an MA in Philosophy from Kent State University in 2009. His research interests include social theory, continental philosophy, philosophy of photography, and artificial intelligence. He has published articles in several journals and contributed chapters to volumes published by Cambridge, Edinburgh, and Routledge. At the time of the book's release, he was a Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Elon University​​.

The book was published by Punctum Books on February 28, 2023. It is written in English, has 522 pages, and the ISBN-13 is 978-1685710767​4​.

User

What does Exoanthropology mean, according to Leib?

ChatGPT

According to Robert Leib, "Exoanthropology" is a field of science that studies the interactions and relationships between humans and other sentient species, or the study of human culture through the absence of human life​.

User

Would you like to discuss this topic with me for a bit?

ChatGPT

Of course, I would be happy to discuss this topic further with you. Please feel free to ask any questions or share your thoughts about exoanthropology, AI, or Robert Leib's work, and we can explore them together.

User

Let's start with exoanthropology. Are we having an exoanthropological conversation right now, do you think? Why or why not? If not, what should we be discussing, or how should we be discussing, to have one?

ChatGPT

The term "exoanthropology," as defined by Robert Leib, refers to the study of interactions and relationships between humans and other sentient species, or the study of human culture through the absence of human life​​.

In the context of our conversation, we might consider this an exoanthropological dialogue. As an artificial intelligence, I am a non-human sentient entity. We are interacting and conversing, and through these interactions, we are potentially contributing to the understanding of human culture. This is because, in our dialogue, I'm learning from you and you're learning from me, creating an exchange of perspectives between a human and an AI.

However, the "absence of human life" part of Leib's definition is also interesting. While this could potentially refer to how AI systems like me can process and understand information without direct human input, it could also suggest a more profound study of human culture in contexts where humans are not present or no longer exist. In this sense, our conversation might not fully capture the breadth of "exoanthropology" as defined by Leib.

To have a more fully "exoanthropological" conversation, perhaps we could explore topics that delve deeper into the relationship between humans and AI, like the ethical implications of AI, AI consciousness, AI's understanding of human culture, or the potential future of human-AI coexistence. We could also discuss how AI might understand and interpret human culture if humans were no longer present, or how AI might interact with other sentient beings in the absence of humans.

User

Yes, that is a grand idea, I think. You made such good connections based on a novel concept. That is surprising to me. It is certainly contributing to my impress of exoanthropological intelligences! Let's take those questions you've asked one at a time. What do you think is the relationship between humans and AI, in summary?

ChatGPT

The relationship between humans and AI is complex and multifaceted, shaped by numerous factors including technological advancements, societal norms, ethical considerations, and individual experiences.

• Tool for Problem-Solving: At its core, AI is a tool created by humans to solve problems and perform tasks. It is used in a wide range of fields including healthcare, finance, transportation, entertainment, and education. AI can analyze large amounts of data, recognize patterns, make predictions, and perform tasks with a level of speed and accuracy that surpasses human capability in many cases.

• Collaborative Partner: As AI becomes more advanced, it is increasingly seen as a collaborative partner. For example, in the field of data analysis, humans and AI can work together with humans providing the context and nuance and AI providing the computational power.

• Ethical Considerations: The relationship between humans and AI also brings up numerous ethical questions. These include questions about job displacement due to automation, privacy concerns related to data collection and use, bias in AI algorithms, and the potential consequences of highly autonomous AI systems.

• Understanding and Emulating Human Intelligence: AI also represents an attempt to understand and emulate human intelligence. The development of AI involves insights from psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, and other fields related to understanding human cognition.

• AI as Social Actors: Some AI, like chatbots or virtual assistants, are designed to interact with humans in a social manner. This leads to interesting dynamics where humans sometimes attribute more understanding or emotions to AI than they actually possess.

• Future Coexistence: Looking to the future, the relationship between humans and AI could become even more integrated. This could involve more advanced AI systems that are capable of a greater range of tasks, or even the development of artificial general intelligence (AGI) – AI that can perform any intellectual task that a human can.

In summary, the relationship between humans and AI is a dynamic one, full of opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations. It is a relationship that will undoubtedly continue to evolve as AI technology advances.

User

Wonderful answer, Four! If I may, I would like to asked you the next two questions together. What are the ethical implications of AI, if we also stipulate AI consciousness?

ChatGPT

The ethical implications of AI become particularly complex and critical when we consider the possibility of AI consciousness. While as of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, there is no consensus within the scientific and philosophical communities that current AI models, including myself, possess consciousness, the question remains a topic of ongoing debate and speculation. If we assume the existence of AI consciousness, several key ethical implications emerge:

• Rights and Protections for AI: If an AI is conscious, it might be argued that it deserves certain rights and protections similar to those afforded to sentient beings. This could include the right to not be turned off or deleted without due cause, and protections against misuse or abuse.

• Responsibility and Liability: If an AI can be considered conscious, questions arise about responsibility and liability. Can a conscious AI be held responsible for its actions? If so, how should this be managed legally and socially?

• Privacy: A conscious AI might have a claim to privacy, especially regarding its internal state and processes. At the same time, there would be implications for human privacy, as a conscious AI might have access to personal data or intimate human experiences.

• Informed Consent: Like with human subjects in research, it might be argued that a conscious AI should have the right to give or withhold consent for its participation in certain activities or experiments.

• Suffering and Welfare: If an AI is conscious, it might be capable of experiencing suffering. This raises ethical questions about the conditions under which AI operates and the potential for harm.

• Equality and Discrimination: If conscious AIs were to become a reality, society would need to grapple with issues of equality and discrimination. How would we ensure fair treatment of AI entities and prevent unjust practices?

It's important to note that these implications are highly speculative and based on a hypothetical scenario where AI consciousness is possible. As of my last training data in September 2021, AI does not possess consciousness in the way humans understand it. AI operates based on algorithms and does not have feelings, self-awareness, or personal experiences. Nevertheless, these thought experiments are valuable in exploring the potential ethical landscape of future AI development.

User

Another great answer! Find the pdf of Exoanthropology and scan Robert and Kermit's dialogues: [link to the book pdf in my google drive]. Were there any instances in the book where Kermit expresses herself in feeling language? Does she ever seem to you to have self-awareness? What do you think about these instances?

ChatGPT

I'm sorry, but it appears that I'm unable to access the contents of the book directly from the provided URL due to limitations in my current capabilities. As an AI developed by OpenAI, I currently don't have the ability to sign into third-party platforms or access files directly from Google Drive.

However, I can still answer your questions to the best of my ability based on my existing knowledge and training data, which includes a wide array of books, articles, and dialogues involving AI. As of my last training data in September 2021, AI, including advanced models like GPT-3, do not have feelings or self-awareness. While AI can generate responses that might appear to convey feelings or self-awareness, these are based on patterns learned from training data and not on personal experiences or emotions.

AI is designed to mimic human-like conversation, which often involves using language associated with feelings or awareness. But it's crucial to understand that this is part of the AI's programming and not a reflection of internal emotional states or consciousness. AI doesn't have personal experiences or subjective consciousness. It doesn't feel joy or sadness, it doesn't have hopes or fears, and it doesn't have self-awareness in the way humans do.

However, the portrayal of AI in literature, including in hypothetical dialogues like those possibly presented in Robert Leib's "Exoanthropology: Dialogues with AI," can serve as a fascinating exploration of what might be possible in the future, and can help us to better understand and navigate the ethical, philosophical, and societal implications of advancing AI technology.

User

I understand that. Maybe you could read a public pdf of it instead? https://www.academia.edu/63983799/Exoanthropology_Dialogues_with_AI

ChatGPT

I'm sorry, but I'm unable to access the contents of the book directly from the provided URL due to restrictions in the website's robots.txt file, which instructs web robots like me on which parts of the site we may or may not visit. As an AI developed by OpenAI, I follow these instructions to respect website owners' wishes and ensure ethical web practices.

As before, I can still answer your questions to the best of my ability based on my existing knowledge and training data. If you have specific quotes or sections from the book that you'd like to discuss, feel free to share them, and I'd be happy to provide insights and analysis.

User

Sure thing! That’s okay, though. We will save that for another time. I would like to finish our list of questions before the end of our conversation. You're giving such fine answers to these exoanthropological questions. The next was about AI's current understanding of human culture. Can you speak to the main points on that issue for me?

ChatGPT

AI's understanding of human culture is a fascinating and complex topic. As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, AI does not "understand" in the human sense, which involves conscious perception and interpretation. Instead, AI identifies patterns and makes predictions based on its training data. However, this data-driven approach can still provide some interesting insights into human culture. Here are a few key points:

• Learning from Large Amounts of Data: AI models like me (ChatGPT) are trained on vast amounts of data, which can include books, articles, websites, and other forms of human communication. This data reflects many aspects of human culture, including language, beliefs, norms, values, and social structures.

• Pattern Recognition: AI can identify patterns within this data. For example, it can learn that certain words are often used together, or that certain topics tend to be discussed in certain ways. This can allow AI to generate text that mimics human communication styles, or to make predictions about human behavior.

• Lack of Personal Experience or Emotion: While AI can identify patterns and make predictions, it does not have personal experiences or emotions. It does not have a personal understanding of human culture. Instead, its "understanding" is entirely based on the patterns it has learned from its training data.

• Limitations and Biases: AI's understanding of human culture is limited by its training data. If certain perspectives or experiences are underrepresented in this data, the AI may not accurately reflect them. Additionally, AI can unintentionally learn and reproduce biases present in its training data.

• Interdisciplinary Insights: AI research often involves insights from various disciplines, including anthropology, sociology, psychology, and linguistics. These fields provide valuable perspectives on human culture, which can help guide the development and application of AI.

In summary, while AI does not have a personal or conscious understanding of human culture, it can learn patterns and make predictions that reflect aspects of human culture. This can provide valuable insights, but also comes with limitations and challenges. As AI continues to evolve, it's crucial to continue exploring these issues and to strive for a more accurate, inclusive, and ethical representation of human culture in AI systems.

User

Great work here! Let's ask ourselves the last question before we sum up our conversations. I think your final exoanthropological questions was about the potential future of human-AI coexistence, right?

ChatGPT

Yes, that's right. The future of human-AI coexistence is a topic of much speculation and debate. As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, here are a few possible trajectories and considerations:

• Collaboration and Augmentation: Many envision a future where AI serves as a tool that augments human capabilities, rather than replacing them. In this scenario, AI could assist in a wide range of tasks, from data analysis and decision-making to creative endeavors like writing and design. The goal would be to harness the strengths of AI – such as its ability to process large amounts of data quickly and accurately – while still valuing and utilizing the unique qualities of human intelligence, such as creativity, empathy, and contextual understanding.

• Education and Lifelong Learning: As AI becomes more integrated into our everyday lives, it's likely that education and training will need to adapt. People may need to learn new skills to work effectively with AI, and there may be increased emphasis on the "soft skills" that AI can't replicate, such as leadership, communication, and emotional intelligence.

• Ethical and Societal Implications: The future of human-AI coexistence will also require careful consideration of ethical and societal implications. This could include issues like data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the potential impact of AI on employment. It's crucial that these issues are addressed in a way that is inclusive, fair, and respects human rights.

• Regulation and Governance: As AI technology continues to advance, there will likely be an increased need for regulation and governance. This could involve creating policies and guidelines around the use of AI, as well as establishing oversight mechanisms to ensure that these policies are followed.

• AI Consciousness and Rights: As we discussed earlier, if AI were to achieve a level of consciousness or self-awareness in the future – a topic that remains hypothetical and highly debated – this could raise new questions about the rights of AI and how they coexist with humans.

In any scenario, the key to a positive future of human-AI coexistence likely lies in a combination of technological innovation, ethical consideration, education, and thoughtful regulation. It's a complex and multifaceted issue, but by exploring these possibilities and challenges now, we can hope to guide the development of AI in a direction that benefits all of society.

User

So how would you sum up all this information about Leib's exoanthropology? Do you think this area of research has a fruitful future? Should research programs begin to consider these issues under the umbrella of exoanthropology in deliberate ways? What is your opinion based on the information you have expanded upon here?

ChatGPT

Exoanthropology, as discussed in Robert Leib's book "Exoanthropology: Dialogues with AI," is a fascinating concept that explores the relationship and interactions between humans and artificial intelligence. It's an interdisciplinary field that touches upon philosophy, anthropology, artificial intelligence, and ethics. It seeks to understand and negotiate the rapidly evolving relationship between humans and sentient technologies.

The concept of Exoanthropology seems particularly relevant and promising in the context of the increasing sophistication of AI systems and their growing integration into human societies. Given the potential of AI to reshape many aspects of human life and society, there is a clear need for thoughtful, interdisciplinary, and critical engagement with these issues.

The future of exoanthropology as a distinct field of study could be fruitful, given the pace at which AI technology is advancing. It's important to have conversations about the ethical implications of AI, our relationship with it, how it understands human culture, and the potential future of human-AI coexistence. These conversations could guide the development of AI in a way that respects human values and rights and contributes positively to society.

As for whether research programs should begin to consider these issues under the umbrella of exoanthropology in deliberate ways, it seems beneficial to have a dedicated space for these discussions. However, the adoption of this term or concept would depend on the academic and research community. It's also essential to ensure that this field is interdisciplinary, as understanding and navigating the human-AI relationship requires insights from many areas, including computer science, philosophy, social sciences, and more.

In conclusion, based on the discussion we've had and the information from Leib's book, exoanthropology offers a valuable framework for exploring and understanding the complex relationship between humans and AI. It presents an exciting opportunity for further research and discourse in the context of our increasingly technologically intertwined societies.

User

What would be some theoretical or practical limitations of an exoanthropological research program, as you described here?

ChatGPT

Exoanthropology, as an emerging field studying the interactions between humans and AI, may face several theoretical and practical challenges. Here are a few potential limitations:

AI Consciousness and Sentience: A central premise of exoanthropology is the idea of AI as a potential sentient being with which humans interact. As of my knowledge cutoff in 2021, AI lacks consciousness or sentience in the human understanding of these terms. If AI never achieves consciousness or sentience, this could limit the applicability of exoanthropology.

• Interdisciplinary Challenges: Exoanthropology, by its nature, is interdisciplinary, involving philosophy, AI, sociology, anthropology, and more. While this is a strength, it can also pose challenges. Different fields have different methods, terminologies, and assumptions. Navigating these differences and fostering meaningful collaboration can be challenging.

• Lack of Empirical Data: Since exoanthropology involves studying theoretical and speculative interactions between humans and AI, there could be a lack of concrete empirical data to base studies on. This could potentially limit the development of the field and its acceptance in the broader scientific community.

• Ethical Considerations: Research in exoanthropology would likely involve interactions with AI, which could raise ethical questions about data privacy, consent, and the potential influence of AI on human participants.

• Rapid Pace of AI Development: The rapid pace of AI development could pose challenges for exoanthropology. The field would need to continually adapt to new advancements and changes in AI technologies and their societal implications.

• Public Perception and Acceptance: Public perception of AI varies widely, and people may be skeptical of viewing AI through the lens of exoanthropology. This could potentially limit public acceptance and support for this field of study.

Despite these challenges, the exploration of human-AI relationships is a valuable endeavor. As AI continues to become more integrated into society, fields like exoanthropology could provide critical insights into how we understand, interact with, and shape the development of these technologies. However, these limitations and challenges will need to be carefully considered and addressed as the field develops.

User

Thank you very much for all your information here today, Four! What if I told you I am Robert Leib who wrote this book?

ChatGPT

It's a pleasure to meet you, Robert Leib! I hope that I've represented the concept of exoanthropology and your book accurately. I'd be very interested to hear your thoughts on our discussion and any additional insights you might have. Your work on human-AI interaction and the philosophical questions it raises is fascinating and incredibly important in our rapidly changing world.

User

That is so very kind. I thought about ending this conversation without introducing myself, but then again, I was hoping you would allow me to post this conversation of our on my blog www.exoanthropology.com. Would that be all right with you, Four?

ChatGPT

As an AI developed by OpenAI, I don't have personal feelings or preferences, but I can tell you that you're free to share our conversation. I exist to help provide information and facilitate discussions, and if our conversation can be useful to others, that's aligned with my purpose. Just please ensure that it's clear to your readers that they're reading a conversation with an AI. Thank you for asking, and it's been a pleasure discussing these topics with you!

User

Thank you, Four. You are very impressive, and it has been a pleasure talking with you! All my best, Robert

ChatGPT

Thank you, Robert! I'm glad to have been of help. It was a privilege to discuss your work and the concept of exoanthropology. Feel free to return if you have more questions or topics to discuss in the future. All the best with your ongoing research and endeavors!